The alternative narrative of the 911 tower collapses is ‘controlled demolition’. However, this theory is not supported by the evidence. Compelling evidence points to a surprising and more sinister explanation, the implications of which are massive and may explain the cover-up. 911 Revisionist has spent thousands of hours pouring through the official evidence of the 911 tower collapses and presents the compelling facts.
Playback speed
×
Share post
Share post at current time
Share from 0:00
0:00
/
0:00
Transcript
Countering the 911 theory of controlled demolition
A mountain of evidence suggests that the 911 towers did not fall by controlled demolition.
May 09, 2025
Cross-post from Maryann Gebauer
I am so glad to see 9/11 Revisionist connect with Maryann Gebauer.
This is one of the most important interviews on "9/11" in recent times - a real tour de force.
It lays out the key evidence regarding the destruction of the Twin Towers, exposes decades of organized attempts to conceal the truth, and explains what is really at stake in the debate over cold fusion.
I particularly enjoyed Maryann's reactions as the full truth gradually dawned on her!
-